Changes to Watertown’s House Districts Proposed, Residents Can Give Input During Hearing

Print More

Wikimedia Commons / Chensiyuan

Massachusetts State House.

Every 10 years Massachusetts Legislative districts are adjusted and changes are proposed for both of Watertown’s House Districts. The Senate District may change, but the new boundaries would not impact the town.

On Friday, Oct. 15, a virtual public hearing will be held to get testimony from the public and residents can submit written comments.

The proposed changes would impact only one precinct in Watertown — Precinct 9 — which is located west of Watertown Square and votes at Watertown Middle School. Under the proposed plan, Precinct 9 would move from the 29th Middlesex District, currently held by Steve Owens, to John Lawn’s district, the 10th Middlesex.

Massachusetts Legislature

The proposed boundaries of the 10th Middlesex House District, which currently includes Watertown Precincts 10-12. The proposal adds Precinct 9. The Watertown districts can be seen on the right side of the picture, Newton on the bottom and Waltham on the upper left.

The 29th Middlesex would represent two-thirds of Watertown’s 12 precincts, while the 1oth Middlesex would include the other third.

Both districts would also see other adjustments. The 10th Middlesex, which also includes Precincts 10-12 in Watertown, would lose two precincts in Waltham and add one precinct in Newton — Ward 3, Precinct 4.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Jennifer-Nicholson-ad.png

Massachusetts Legislature

The 29th Middlesex House District would lose Precinct 9 in Watertown, but would still include 1-8 (Watertown is on the left side of the map). A partial district would be added in North Cambridge.

The 29th Middlesex would still include Precincts 1-8 in Watertown, and would add a partial precinct in North Cambridge.

Watertown will remain in the Second Suffolk and Middlesex Senate District, represented by Will Brownsberger, along with Belmont. According to a piece written by Brownsberger, the district would add most of West Cambridge and part of Allston, and lose the South End, Back Bay and most of the East Fens.

The virtual public hearing will be on Oct. 15 at 1 p.m. to discuss the changes to both the House and Senate districts. Members of the public can view the hearing here: https://malegislature.gov/Events/Hearings/Detail/4028 Those wanting to give verbal testimony can register by clicking here. Written testimony can be submitted to the committee until Monday Oct. 18 here: https://malegislature.gov/Redistricting/Contact.

5 thoughts on “Changes to Watertown’s House Districts Proposed, Residents Can Give Input During Hearing

  1. Changing Precinct 9 to 10 doesn’t affect me directly, but I am not comfortable adding a partial precinct in Cambridge to Watertown. Many people have mentioned that they don’t want Watertown to become another Cambridge and this might create a slow leak to changing our values if our representative also represents them. Also, losing two precincts in Waltham and adding one in Newton also would be similar to adding Cambridge. Cambridge and Newton are big cities with big city politics that don’t fit with Watertown’s. Waltham is a more moderate voting population. If I’m correct, I think Watertown broke away from Cambridge early on in our history. Maybe it should stay that way.

  2. “Our values?” Perhaps Watertown can benefit from exposure to Cambridge and Newton’s views. Watertown is, after all, a city, where sclerosis keeps it rigid, unresponsive, and unable to adapt to progressive thinking.

  3. This redistricting is hardly out of the ordinary. It happens every decade and is always controversial. It is good for Watertown to have two solid State Representatives, and this tweak to the map will do nothing to jeopardize that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *