15 thoughts on “OP-ED: Resident Concern About Loss of Hundreds of Trees During Redevelopment Project

  1. Sharon, I completely agree with you! It is really terrible to cut down more trees in this town. We need the nature, the shade, the outdoor open space. In rainy years the river floods – trees and grass and bushes absorb water. When it all is paved flooding gets worse. As a parent I can tell you that there is not enough open space. Lots of kids here don’t have yards, and use the playgrounds daily. Look at a map of the town! The largest open space is a private, inaccessible golf course.

  2. I hope the young activists groups will help to bring attention to this matter which is affecting all of us here in Watertown. They have been so vocal trying to make changes elsewhere. This is truly urgent! I hope everyone can support this.

  3. When the Four Horsemen of development, greed, mendacity, degradation, and displacement ride into town dangling their promises like bright, shiny objects, elected officials are beguiled, politicians see dollar signs, and ordinary people have only the simple wisdom of their knowledge of a place and its value combined with their informed advocacy to fight them.

  4. Thank you for publishing this letter, Charlie. Could you please make a correction: the lovely trees in this photo by Samatha Rao Vuppala are not in Arsenal Park. This picture shows a few of the hundreds of trees at risk in the Arsenal on the Charles development discussed in Sharon Bromberg-Lim’s letter.

  5. As you have written trees are valuable for removing carbon from our air.
    They are one of the most valuable assets Watertown has.

  6. yeah nice touch, we really need them! drove through arsenal yards or whatever it’s called on a sunday morning really not too impressed & a lack of green. on the other hand talking to a tree company workers while they were removing an old elm in my neighborhood, unfortunately for safety. they told me they are removing a lot of the old growth for this reason due to the droughts, such a shame & no one is replacing them, not very good. so I get what you’re saying but we’re missing a huge other side of this. Watertown has the 20′ in tree placement from the street, I have a great one. why can’t we include the whole yard it would help getting some good growth trees where there are none now. Waltham has established a tree farm on the old farm near francis market & they keep increasing it with new growth, how about us this is what we need this is what works, just need some open space the funds are there.

  7. This note us for Alexandria Real Estate Equities regarding cutting down the 257 trees as part of the Arsenal project. If the trees are diseased get the tree warden over there to point out those trees. Otherwise, these trees have been removing Carbon Dioxide out of our environment for years and should not be touched. They are beautiful and should be recognized as a part of the historic section of the Arsenal. If your developers can’t build around these trees then you need to get a new developer or planner. Arsenal Yards have already made the area look like an apartment mecca which only the wealthy can afford even though they promised low income housing. So if this promise was not honored then the fact that Alexandria RRE have promised to replace trees of those destroyed, this will probably not happen either.
    Watertown needs to get a handle on the expansion of it’s neighborhoods and preserve those things sacred to Watertown.

  8. Any construction plan that would destroy so many vital community assets is poorly and carelessly conceived. It is reckless and should be opposed.

  9. I WAS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE WATERTOW ARSENAL
    DEVELOPEMENT CORPORATION.
    OUR COMMITTE ALL FELL IN LOVE WITH THIS BEAUTIFUL
    SITE.
    SHARON BROMBERG-LIN ‘S WORDS SAY IT BETTER
    THAN I COULD EVER DO.
    WHEN WE WERE BUILDING THE ARTS CENTER
    ALEXANDRIA MADE A SIGNIFICANT DONATION
    TOWARD THE ARTS CENTER PROJECT.
    AND WE WERE GRATEFUL
    TO COME IN NOW AND WIPE OUT SO MANY TREES
    WOULD SOUR THEIR PRESENCE WITH
    THE TOWN OF WATERTOWN

  10. Thank you for publicizing this travesty. The trees add more to our quality of life than what has turned into a runaway development that will bring traffic, noise and pollution WHILE taking away green space. Let’s STOP further devastation of what little nature we have left here.

  11. My husband and I are opposed to the proposal to remove such a grave number of trees. I have often seen and felt the changing seasons unfold by going to this gorgeous spot. Certainly an alternative could be reached. Trees are living, breathing beauty that literally provide us humans with air! Are we to wall our roads in with concrete? There must be careful discerning thought to this plan.
    I lived in Oregon when families stood blocking the equipment of lumber companies that would strip entire hillsides, trying to get them to selectively ” mine.”
    The importance of these trees is a given. The plan sounds ill-conceived and archaic and greed driven.
    Come on, Watertown STRONG.
    Native of Watertown,
    Tina D.

  12. Seems their needs to be a significant tax levee placed on projects that engage in whole slaughter of a tree forest. I confess I have not seen the plans but it sure sounds like a price needs to be paid when actions of this magnitude are considered.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *